ottbike
Active Member
Even all the other products coming out of TB are on time... it's literally just Toronto's Outlook that is all messed up.
(Kitchener-Waterloo) Bombardier LRT vehicles delayed
Even all the other products coming out of TB are on time... it's literally just Toronto's Outlook that is all messed up.
(Kitchener-Waterloo) Bombardier LRT vehicles delayed
No, the parts were from else where, mainly USA, since its a 60% US buy and having issues at the plant.The delivery for the KC and Cincinnati CAF streetcars are delayed too. Parts from the same manufacturer?
The big issue for Bombardier doesn't seem to be the work being done in Thunder Bay, it's the quality of the parts coming into that assembly facility.
So Alstrom would have the same issues, if the plant where they are making the materials to be assembled in Ottawa has the same issues as the Bombardier plants outside of Ontario supplying the Thunder Bay plant.
That's true. But my point is, they're not having those same kind of delays. I did some digging, and Alstom is having some parts manufactured in Sao Paolo, with overall vehicle manufacturing being done in Hornell, NY, before final assembly is done in Ottawa. So yes, I guess they're subject to the same "developing market" parts quality issues, but there have been no reports of that thus far. That same plant also just got a huge contract to build the next generation of HSR vehicles for the NEC.
The Ion order is an option that was taken up on the Metrolinx order. The Metrolinx order is an option that was taken up on the TTC one. There was (and will be) only one tender - the TTC one.*Oh and to add, does anyone know what the penalties are in the ION contract? And the general Metrolinx order? I can't remember if that has been tendered yet or if the ION order is a part of the Metrolinx one.
I wonder how the damages the TTC is seeking payment for will be calculated (assuming the TTC wins more than the bare minimum as negotiated in the contract). Would lost revenues (from overcapacity and retired streetcars precluding ridership growth) be something the TTC could win compensation for? I know it's something that people have been discussing for months but is there a mechanism whereby the TTC could force Bombardier to either pay for the 60 car option or have it detached from the current order, transferred to a new company and Bombardier would then cover the costs above and beyond the current price of the 60 car option. Also, what happens in the case of a bailout for Bombardier?
*Oh and to add, does anyone know what the penalties are in the ION contract? And the general Metrolinx order? I can't remember if that has been tendered yet or if the ION order is a part of the Metrolinx one.
The did negotiate pricing on the Metrolinx option. And remember, when they started that tender, the assumption was that TTC would be procuring, not Metrolinx. In the end, I expect it was an excuse to not retender it - which would have had a risk that Bombardier would have increased their price, given how much lower their bid was than the next bid.@nfitz - Huh, I thought they would've split the orders, if only because the TTC order required specialized cars and the Metrolinx models would be largely standardized.
Or, perhaps, due to the fact that what was being asked for was too much to give up considering they seem to be coming out of the woods....if the rumoured Delta order for Cseries planes happens before the end of April they will have surpassed their initial target of 300 firm orders before the plane goes into service and with such a large order (on the heals of the Air Canada order) you may see more of the existing orders convert their options to firm status (as Air Baltic did this week) to protect delivery slots.....there has been a positive shift in momentum lately for their order book and they are no longer negotiating from a position of hemorrhaging under the board room table.Bombardier has reportedly turned down the Canadian government's offer for aid, allegedly due to disagreement over governance.