Toronto Toronto Coach Terminal Redevelopment | ?m | ?s | CreateTO

APTA-2048 said:
I have a feeling it’s more of a problem that they don’t care. This building was pretty much tag free while it was operating. I think it’s getting demolished, so the City doesn’t care.
Click to expand...

The graffiti by-law does not have an exception for buildings that are vacant, so far as I can recall.

If the City wants it torn down, then great, let them get to it! Until then, they need to keep it up.
 
Northern Light said:
The graffiti by-law does not have an exception for buildings that are vacant, so far as I can recall.

If the City wants it torn down, then great, let them get to it! Until then, they need to keep it up.
Click to expand...
I don't think taxpayers would want their money spent to keep something clean of tags only it for it to be all back there in a month or so. You know, better things to spend on and all that... 😼
 
UtakataNoAnnex said:
I don't think taxpayers would want their money spent to keep something clean of tags only it for it to be all back there in a month or so. You know, better things to spend on and all that... 😼
Click to expand...

I agree, which is why they should expedite demolition.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top