Got this in the mail today:
Not sure if I've ever heard of a public meeting being held at 10am on a work day. Kinda defeats the purpose, no?
From my perspective - Big Daddy was responding to a legitimate question - why the reduction in height, posed by 67cup. Big Daddy's response, for the benefit of 67cup, covered some of the major possible reasons for the rethink in height, adding the qualification that at this point, other than those directly involved, know one knows for sure. An appropriate for someone who may not have been following all the issues with the proposed building over the past couple of years.
What I fail to see is how Big Daddy's response warranted the two replies above. The issues mentioned by Big Daddy have been raised before - if anything, the first comment is in my opinion both inaccurate and gratuitous. As for the second response, quoted above, its imagery applies to that response itself, and not to Big Daddy's comment.
Haha, a Nimby will always find time, no matter what time its atBut, yeah, not so easy for many members of the public to attend.
Scroll back umpteen pages - the exact same arguments - all the way to "just another one" had been posted before by the same. Yes, just another one that is a Foster, if we are only that lucky.
It's not for anyone's benefit - it's rehashing the same tired points over again.
AoD
That's a good question. They're probably giving Mizrahi a tough go.Not so fast! Have the ants conducted a shadow study to assess how the massive height will affect Jesse Ketchum Park?
^ That's all we're getting here, I'm afraid; twin, blue towers, for ants.
Yes. I drew them up.You've seen the floor plans then?