Toronto LNX Residences at Bloor and Dundas | 87.5m | 27s | Lormel Homes | Richmond Architects

Glad to see this one get built but of course by playing hardball Perks and the city have managed to avoid negotiating any benefits for the neighbourhood. Great job! The OMB result should have been assumed to be the expected result, and they could likely have negotiated a 19-20 storey building with section 37 benefits (the latter is all I care about).

The Board's whole point about this being the only site in the area that can handle this height because it is removed from the other neighbourhoods makes no sense. The neighbouring plaza (the owners of which are probably having a celebration tonight) can clearly hold a tall building adjacent to the tracks that is sufficiently back from Dundas. And the Giraffe site, while it had other problems, is no closer to the residential neighbourhood than this site.
 
This one's starting to rumble a bit, and will get going mid-2015.

42
 
Lormel has opted to develop a rental building here instead, and bumped it up to 24 storeys:
upload_2017-3-19_20-57-53.png


upload_2017-3-19_20-58-13.png


upload_2017-3-19_20-58-38.png


upload_2017-3-19_20-58-59.png


upload_2017-3-19_20-59-21.png


upload_2017-3-19_21-0-23.png


upload_2017-3-19_21-0-48.png


upload_2017-3-19_21-1-10.png


upload_2017-3-19_21-2-4.png


upload_2017-3-19_21-2-21.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-3-19_20-57-53.png
    upload_2017-3-19_20-57-53.png
    243.7 KB · Views: 1,122
  • upload_2017-3-19_20-58-13.png
    upload_2017-3-19_20-58-13.png
    311.2 KB · Views: 1,088
  • upload_2017-3-19_20-58-38.png
    upload_2017-3-19_20-58-38.png
    170 KB · Views: 1,076
  • upload_2017-3-19_20-58-59.png
    upload_2017-3-19_20-58-59.png
    418.3 KB · Views: 1,034
  • upload_2017-3-19_20-59-21.png
    upload_2017-3-19_20-59-21.png
    432.1 KB · Views: 1,052
  • upload_2017-3-19_21-0-23.png
    upload_2017-3-19_21-0-23.png
    230.9 KB · Views: 1,051
  • upload_2017-3-19_21-0-48.png
    upload_2017-3-19_21-0-48.png
    440.9 KB · Views: 1,016
  • upload_2017-3-19_21-1-10.png
    upload_2017-3-19_21-1-10.png
    408 KB · Views: 1,007
  • upload_2017-3-19_21-2-4.png
    upload_2017-3-19_21-2-4.png
    436.4 KB · Views: 992
  • upload_2017-3-19_21-2-21.png
    upload_2017-3-19_21-2-21.png
    505.6 KB · Views: 1,004
Shoring and excavation have commenced. Hopefully the city will put in the new traffic light here that was mentioned somewhere...
 
SPA docs resubmitted in December.

42
 
May 17
Gee,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,dead as a door nail and haven't miss much since my last visit a few months ago
40406902780_de4a0c9124_b.jpg

27342874907_8b088935e6_b.jpg

42213555901_524f2df66e_b.jpg

42213550851_042aa1af11_b.jpg

42213549331_1c2e6e4203_b.jpg
 
Two days ago, midday, no workers onsite:

DSC08974.jpg
DSC08975.jpg


42
 

Attachments

  • DSC08974.jpg
    DSC08974.jpg
    199.2 KB · Views: 974
  • DSC08975.jpg
    DSC08975.jpg
    336.9 KB · Views: 980
Someone has said the site been shut down by the Ministry of the Environment. Unknown to the owner, chemicals where found on site at this stage, that the site needs to be clean before the site can be built. Not sure how true this is or what is up since various equipment still on site. One would think that the equipment would be removed long ago if it going to be a year or so before work can take place.
 

Back
Top