The Charles Street side should have that taller entrance extrusion found on the Hayden St. elevation; it's more stately and signifies the building's main entrance in a stronger way.
It seems as though we have lost the vertical fins that the podium was going to have. Those mullions in the same pattern just don't have the same effect. When I look at this project and compare it to CASA (I), other than the fritted glass which is likely a higher cost, I see a design that has many austerity measures applied to its earlier iterations in order to create an even higher profit margin. It's a shame. It's as if Cresford got greedy after CASA and decided to really pull things back on the next phase. I was hoping for something even more elegant than the original CASA, but the podium, the tower, the materials, and the detailing -- they all strike me as compromised when compared to the original.
I say that as someone who appreciates the work aA has done here but also sees how the designers were limited by their client.