1) I don't disagree that the architectural goal of reflecting the interior on the exterior is laudable, but I think it's so seldom achieved in condo towers (anywhere) that I feel it's normally a negligible component of the end result. My experience is that being able to "read" a house on its exterior is a far more reasonable ask of an architect, and my take is that's a detail that some enlightened clients might ask for, but not most.
2) Agreed.
3) Here, everything you're highlighting just adds to the awkward. This building isn't a little bit awkward, it's really awkward. Like awkward to the point where it amuses me. When that's the intention, as I am certain it is here, I have some not-too-grudging respect for the balls it takes to propose and build that. (When it's unintentional, it typically just results in something awful by any measure.) I'd never call this building beautiful, but I'm warm to its form anyway.
42
2) Agreed.
3) Here, everything you're highlighting just adds to the awkward. This building isn't a little bit awkward, it's really awkward. Like awkward to the point where it amuses me. When that's the intention, as I am certain it is here, I have some not-too-grudging respect for the balls it takes to propose and build that. (When it's unintentional, it typically just results in something awful by any measure.) I'd never call this building beautiful, but I'm warm to its form anyway.
42