News   Dec 05, 2025
 1K     5 
News   Dec 05, 2025
 3.3K     7 
News   Dec 05, 2025
 627     0 

GO Transit: Construction Projects (Metrolinx, various)

I was told once that 4 tracks to Long Branch would require a new Browns Line Bridge, fairly pricey undertaking. Plus an additional bridge over Etobicoke Creek.

Quad tracks west of Port Credit into Clarkson will require a lot of work and br a tight fit with residential neighbourhoods backing onto the tracks, plus the ravines etc.

West of Clarkson the possibilities of adding a full time fourth track are far more possible, with both the room, and in some places, existing infrastructure that could be reconfigured, revitalized, repurposed.

Signalling upgrades would be called for.

And electrification? Or at least infrastructure where it makes sense as these changes would be made.

Also Bayview. Do you extend these alterations/improvements through to the Bayview Junction (at considerable cost and multiple ownerships) and then around the corner into West Harbour and beyond?

The possibilities are large, the appetitive, well maybe more bite sized?

Add this to the list of things I would rather see than a 401 tunnel :D
 
Posted on the Metrolinx IG account today. I wonder if this rail will be for the 4th track on the Lakeshore East/Stouffville Line.

Screenshot_20250917-154509_Instagram.jpg

Screenshot_20250917-154515_Instagram.jpg
 
This is another case where it would have been cheaper for them to build the station for quad track with two side platforms (same as the old Exhibition layout and planned Park Lawn layout), avoiding the cost of that island platform on the express track used by trains that don't stop there anyway
Yes cheaper to build, but operationally it helps when one of said "local" tracks get blocked for whatever reason, the can use the "express" tracks and still be able to provide local service.
You see that on occasion on LSE. When one track is not able to be used, a local train operates express from Danforth to Guildwood due to no platform on the middle track at Scarborough or Eglinton.
 
All that’s needed is to cut eack track and make a slight shift - Track 1 east of Danforth will be connected to the new north track, Track 2 east of Danforth connects to existing Track 1, etc

- Paul
Does connecting the fourth track in this manner create a bend as trains approach Danforth GO, which would require them to slow down even if they don’t stop at the station? Stouffville, Express LSE, VIA etc.?
 
Does connecting the fourth track in this manner create a bend as trains approach Danforth GO, which would require them to slow down even if they don’t stop at the station? Stouffville, Express LSE, VIA etc.?
It should not affect speed limits, if properly designed. Possibly a slight lurch, that's all.

- Paul
 
There’s enough room, but there isn’t going to be any steps taken to protect the area for a 4th track, so a lot of work is going to have to be done at Long Branch whenever that happens
Guildwood Station was rebuilt like eight years ago with two island platforms, including space and structure for a fourth track to be easily dropped in. Then rail expansion plans seemed to have forgotten about it.
 
I'm not aware of any immediate plan to add a fourth track west of Canpa - but it's a no brainer if one extrapolates the potential for growth in service along LSW.

The stretch from Canpa to Port Credit would take a lot of money, in grade separation and bridge construction... west of there, there is much more land width, but many of the existing grade separations and bridges are only three tracks wide at the moment.

However, there is a lot that could be done with better signalling to improve the throughput of those three tracks. A fourth track from Clarkson to Oakville and again further west might be enough for a decade or two.

- Paul
I can also say there was no plan for a fourth track west of Canpa, at least a decade ago.

That said, the entire corridor should be protected for...hex(?)-tracking if we are serious about high speed rail to London and Windsor, but I digress.
 
Some shots of the 2nd track work heading west out of Guelph Central.

bP+VktQHQs2C0UoA6qHMgw.jpg

lR0UKgbETSm2+ggaJVbs5Q.jpg
awgBMnTER+yWE+ck6am1nw.jpg
FoB+RxEbT%WisJOAE9s6tg.jpg
vLuDsNi%TSO81kvLyurW0g.jpg
7+7ODnxpQd60HM79F11VbQ.jpg
dojmbcWcRVS+Rq0OEeZMow.jpg

Just before the Hanlon overpass
0WF1IEHCRQi5Z+mD07Hv7A.jpg

Future Breslau Station
IMO this station should be built sooner than later. The western edge of the Kitchener Line needs a proper park and ride station. Trying to get out of Kitchener Station after a train arrives is complete bedlam.
%kfSGfW1RtO5XILbyT5wKQ.jpg
i19vBI2rTbCLJtEuKU%GOw.jpg
 
That's correct, the Region purchased land on the other side of the tracks from the original location and next to Fountain St.

The future Dolman St extension (phase 2 of the Madwest subdivision by Madison) will intersect Fountain roughly at the entrance for the future GO station.

The area won't be high density like some stations because of the proximity to YKF but the Region is still planning on partnering with a developer to get some affordable housing built with the station.

The Region is currently extending the watermain along Fountain to serve future development around the station. There is also a significant gravity sewer project in the works that will take sewage from the East Side Lands down to Kitchener's WWTP. I haven't checked holding provisions recently but it wouldn't surprise me if there's some servicing related provisions in place for the property (there's no existing water service for example).
 
Guildwood Station was rebuilt like eight years ago with two island platforms, including space and structure for a fourth track to be easily dropped in. Then rail expansion plans seemed to have forgotten about it.
Several grade crossings either side of that station. Desiring a fourth track might force the issue on dealing with some or all of them. At the same time, the deferral or abandonment of the Scarborough flyover might mean there isn’t enough capacity in the Union direction to properly use a 4th main track?
 
t the same time, the deferral or abandonment of the Scarborough flyover might mean there isn’t enough capacity in the Union direction to properly use a 4th main track?
Seems to me there's plenty of space to put a 5th pasing track on the east side - including making the platform two-sided. The tunnels are all long enough - I'd assumed that this was the plan (not the plan that they'd do it, but they'd at least protect for it). Even the existing bridge over St. Clair may have a little space - though there's well over 15-metres of space to add another span (or 2!) if it's not wide enough.

So I don't think it's even very expensive to do!

1758403832369.png
 

Back
Top