News   Nov 29, 2024
 147     0 
News   Nov 29, 2024
 134     0 
News   Nov 29, 2024
 325     0 

General cycling issues (Is Toronto bike friendly?)

I wish Queens Park and the MTO had enacted bike lane standards province wide back in the early 2000s. That was the time to tell the municipalities beneath them that bike infrastructure must not cause vehicular congestion.
 
How does that relate to anything? The "congestion" argument is just rationalization. If it wasn't that it would be something else that pits suburban drivers against people in the city who bike and walk around.

But I am curious. How do you, personally, balance the reduction in collisions and injuries from installation of bike lanes against potentially increased travel times for vehicles?
 

Toronto police cracking down on unsafe e-bike operators​


An education and enforcement campaign titled “Safe Streets, Safe Roads” began on Monday and will be in effect for the next two weeks until Sunday, Nov. 17, primarily in the downtown core.

Traffic officers will be pulling over those who are potentially breaking the law, including those who are speeding, running red lights, hopping on and off sidewalks, and not wearing a helmet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PL1
The "congestion" argument is just rationalization.
Rationalization of what? If there was not congestion related to bike lanes Ford would bounce to something else to complain about.
How do you, personally, balance the reduction in collisions and injuries from installation of bike lanes against potentially increased travel times for vehicles?
Personally I don’t, but professionally this would go to the actuaries. Those are the folks who will decide how many additional dead or injured cyclists are worth an extra few minutes saved for drivers.
 
Rationalization of what? If there was not congestion related to bike lanes Ford would bounce to something else to complain about.
Bike lanes are pure culture war. Not about congestion. You can tell about how gleeful Cory Teneycke was about goading the NDP/Liberals into opposing the policy.
 
Last edited:
Bike lanes are pure culture war. Not about congestion. You can tell about how gleeful Cory Teneycke was about going the NDP/Liberals into opposing the policy.

100%.

All data and evidence has pointed out this policy is nonsense.

  • The Ontario Traffic Council said so.
  • The Bloor BIA has said business is up.
  • All the admins and doctors on hospital row are in favor.
  • EMS and fire have said no negative impacts on response times.
  • Fords own government in their initial report said it woild potentially have no impact on traffic.
It's all nonsense and a total waste of money to have no benefit.

Unfortunately politics today is all about populism, wedge issues and culture wars and divide.

It's almost like being intelligent and using real data and evidence is a bad thing.
 
Bike lanes are pure culture war. Not about congestion.
But those are the cards we're dealt. The difference is how you deal with them - and I would argue that eliminating car lanes across the Province's capital city without any regard for possible push back from the city's overseers at Queen's Park was a predictable folly. Premier Doug Ford has been complaining about Toronto's bike lanes since 2018, and was a vocal opponent of them when he was on Toronto city council. We elect and expect our municipal politicians to be able to understand, anticipate and work within both the official regs and personalities coming out of Queen's Park.

So, it's 2018, we have a new Premier. Toronto wants to expand its throttling of many of the city's main roads in order to install more bike lanes. First step, Mayor Tory should be on the phone with Premier Ford asking that the MTO provide standards for bike lanes - do's and don'ts. Maybe the Premier bans all bike lane expansion where a traffic lane is removed - well at least we'd know that before we start, and we could then work around this.
 
Last edited:
Cars must be kept out of some spaces for the safety and sanity of all residents.
Sure, but we're talking about roads.

There are already many disabled parking spots, accessible transit services etc., and YES we should have more but that's not the same as the absurd demand to remove all bike lanes due to disabled needs.
You have misrepresented what I wrote. I did not advocate for the removal of all bike lanes. I think separated bike lanes which use bollards are problematic. I said they were a scourge for the disabled and that is the truth. I have seen many bike lanes that I support, but those separated ones with bollards are a major concern.

I would support options to improve accessibility but your blanket claims that "disabled do not support bike lanes" are blinkered.....
Thank you for supporting options to improve accessibility, but while my blanket statement may sound extreme, I would be happy to correct it to say, the vast majority of people with mobile and sight disabilities do not support bike lanes. You can call it blinkered, but it is an inconvenient reality.

......and ignore the diversity and intersectionality of the cycling and disability community.
I confess to being ignorant of this intersectionality.

You need more creativity. Unfortunately this kind of black and white thinking bolsters Doug Ford's nonsense actions and will lead to more people getting hurt or killed.
Actually, I would say that it is you that needs more creativity. Advocating for separated bike lanes at the cost of accessibility of disabled citizens and then stating that there are already many disabled spots does not take into account the challenged the disabled face every day. I have simply encountered too many to mention here (sounds like a cop out, but I have enough to literally write a book). As for Premier Ford's pursuit of removing bike lanes, he makes no mention of accommodating disabilities. His focus is on improving traffic congestion.
 
I’m in Vancouver visiting and Toronto could learn a thing or two about how to build a proper bike lane from them.
That's in part because unlike in Ontario, the BC ministry of transportation has a province-wide guide on where and how to build bike infrastructure the BC Active Transportation Design Guide.

FWIW, I asked ChatGPT to run a quick summary of the BC bike lane guides and congestion, see below.

Impact on Traffic Congestion

The BC Active Transportation Design Guide acknowledges that adding bike lanes may initially appear to reduce road capacity for cars, but it emphasizes that:
  1. Long-Term Reduction in Traffic Congestion:
    • In the long run, the addition of bike lanes can reduce overall traffic congestion by encouraging more people to cycle, which may decrease the number of cars on the road. This can lead to less demand for car-based infrastructure and a more balanced transportation network.
    • By shifting some car trips to bicycles, congestion can be alleviated, especially in urban areas with high car traffic and limited road space.
  2. Induced Demand for Active Transportation:
    • The guide suggests that by providing safe, attractive, and well-connected cycling infrastructure, cities can induce demand for cycling as a viable and appealing alternative to driving. This can help shift modal choices, particularly for short to medium-length trips that are well-suited for cycling.
    • Evidence from cities around the world shows that when bike lanes are added, more people are likely to choose cycling, thereby reducing pressure on the road network and promoting a shift toward sustainable transport.
  3. Reducing the Need for Car Parking:
    • In areas with bike lanes, there's often an associated reduction in demand for on-street parking. This can free up road space for other uses and help reduce the impacts of congestion, particularly in areas where parking is limited or scarce.
  4. Dynamic and Flexible Use of Road Space:
    • The BCATDG emphasizes that bike lanes are part of a larger strategy for efficient use of road space. Cities can implement measures such as traffic calming, lane narrowing, and time-of-day management to accommodate bike lanes without unduly impacting traffic flow.
    • In some cases, cities may implement dedicated cycling facilities during peak hours or convert underused car lanes into bike lanes, which can increase the overall capacity of the transportation network.
Now, a lot of this would rankle Premier Ford, but the above thinking should have been part of Toronto's ask from the province before the Ford era. Imagine if we had this level of guidance from the Ontario MTO before 2018.
 
Last edited:
Also looks like he is expanding the scope of targets to remove per CTV Ottawa
1730914287229.png
 
That's in part because unlike in Ontario, the BC ministry of transportation has a province-wide guide on where and how to build bike infrastructure the BC Active Transportation Design Guide.

FWIW, I asked ChatGPT to run a quick summary of the BC bike lane guides and congestion, see below.

Impact on Traffic Congestion

The BC Active Transportation Design Guide acknowledges that adding bike lanes may initially appear to reduce road capacity for cars, but it emphasizes that:
  1. Long-Term Reduction in Traffic Congestion:
    • In the long run, the addition of bike lanes can reduce overall traffic congestion by encouraging more people to cycle, which may decrease the number of cars on the road. This can lead to less demand for car-based infrastructure and a more balanced transportation network.
    • By shifting some car trips to bicycles, congestion can be alleviated, especially in urban areas with high car traffic and limited road space.
  2. Induced Demand for Active Transportation:
    • The guide suggests that by providing safe, attractive, and well-connected cycling infrastructure, cities can induce demand for cycling as a viable and appealing alternative to driving. This can help shift modal choices, particularly for short to medium-length trips that are well-suited for cycling.
    • Evidence from cities around the world shows that when bike lanes are added, more people are likely to choose cycling, thereby reducing pressure on the road network and promoting a shift toward sustainable transport.
  3. Reducing the Need for Car Parking:
    • In areas with bike lanes, there's often an associated reduction in demand for on-street parking. This can free up road space for other uses and help reduce the impacts of congestion, particularly in areas where parking is limited or scarce.
  4. Dynamic and Flexible Use of Road Space:
    • The BCATDG emphasizes that bike lanes are part of a larger strategy for efficient use of road space. Cities can implement measures such as traffic calming, lane narrowing, and time-of-day management to accommodate bike lanes without unduly impacting traffic flow.
    • In some cases, cities may implement dedicated cycling facilities during peak hours or convert underused car lanes into bike lanes, which can increase the overall capacity of the transportation network.
Now, a lot of this would rankle Premier Ford, but the below thinking should have been part of Toronto's ask from the province before the Ford era. Imagine if we had this level of guidance from the Ontario MTO before 2018.
How long do we expect to wait until demand builds?

Personally though I don't agree with Ford, and I especially don't agree with ramming legislation though washout checks and balances.
 
Given Ford’s anti-bike crusade, I think Toronto should legalize the following commonplace practices as it’s free and would encourage safer cycling

-proceeding with pedestrian walk signals
-treat stop signs as yields
-allow contraflow on one-way streets
-allow cycling on sidewalks (yielding to pedestrians)

The last one is more important for low density suburbs, and may need to exclude e-bikes
 

Back
Top