News   Jun 02, 2023
 1.5K     1 
News   Jun 02, 2023
 875     0 
News   Jun 02, 2023
 1.2K     2 

Canada's next Governor General

SunriseChampion

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Mar 5, 2009
Messages
6,777
Reaction score
2,746
Location
Majorca
Brother, all your posts on this subject are largely assumed.
I know. I've said as much.

You've assumed the age/generation of the GG's staff, their work ethic and performance. But this alleged behaviour, this is the assumption you won't take?
I'm also assuming I'm right so......

I'm just doing my usual devil's advocate obligations.
 

SunriseChampion

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Mar 5, 2009
Messages
6,777
Reaction score
2,746
Location
Majorca
That is actually not what GGs are supposed to do or be. We live in a democracy - think of England,. the Queen can refuse to sign legislation but never does so. Would you want her representative (or any 'president') to have this power to over-ride an elected parliament?

When the "majority" of said parliament is elected by a minority of people and/or electors?

What's the difference? In fact, in those cases (which are the cases in both Canada and the UK) it might in fact be beneficial to have a benevolent head of state making the call on everyone's behalf so that the minority don't get to lord it over the majority which is what we normally have in this country.

The argument for the democratic choice sounds beyond silly when talking about a FPTP electoral system.
 

Northern Light

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
May 20, 2007
Messages
25,594
Reaction score
68,849
Location
Toronto/EY
When the "majority" of said parliament is elected by a minority of people and/or electors?

What's the difference? In fact, in those cases (which are the cases in both Canada and the UK) it might in fact be beneficial to have a benevolent head of state making the call on everyone's behalf so that the minority don't get to lord it over the majority which is what we normally have in this country.

The argument for the democratic choice sounds beyond silly when talking about a FPTP electoral system.

We agree on FPTP..............

But this sounds like two wrongs don't make a right to me.
 

lenaitch

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Sep 5, 2017
Messages
4,764
Reaction score
4,881
When the "majority" of said parliament is elected by a minority of people and/or electors?

What's the difference? In fact, in those cases (which are the cases in both Canada and the UK) it might in fact be beneficial to have a benevolent head of state making the call on everyone's behalf so that the minority don't get to lord it over the majority which is what we normally have in this country.

The argument for the democratic choice sounds beyond silly when talking about a FPTP electoral system.

Actually, an alternative voting system (ranked ballot, proportional, etc.) under our system might raise the importance of the GG. By closer reflecting the popular vote, we could well end up with more fractured parties regularly vying to form coalitions and trying to convince the GG that they enjoy the confidence of the House. This is not uncommon in some European countries.

Although not involving a coalition, the BC LtGov was the most recent to have to exercise its reserve authority when, after an election, the two main parties were virtually tied.
 

Admiral Beez

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 28, 2007
Messages
11,399
Reaction score
5,434
Actually, an alternative voting system (ranked ballot, proportional, etc.) under our system might raise the importance of the GG. By closer reflecting the popular vote, we could well end up with more fractured parties regularly vying to form coalitions and trying to convince the GG that they enjoy the confidence of the House. This is not uncommon in some European countries.

Although not involving a coalition, the BC LtGov was the most recent to have to exercise its reserve authority when, after an election, the two main parties were virtually tied.
Australia and NZ modified their voting systems and maintained their unelected GG. So can Canada.

If we’re electing the GG it’s no longer a GG, but instead is a President. I can’t see Canada becoming a Republic in my life time. The infighting over the new Constitution and provincial and linguistic rights would be impossible. If we’re a Republic, do we still call our regions provinces?
 
Last edited:

Admiral Beez

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 28, 2007
Messages
11,399
Reaction score
5,434

I hope this isn’t another case of prioritizing optics.
 
Last edited:

AlvinofDiaspar

Moderator
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
32,538
Reaction score
27,195
Location
Toronto

I hope this isn’t another case of prioritizing optics.

Not a bad choice even if it is - and as a ceremonial position, optics is half the job.

AoD
 

Top